King Arthur - User Reviews

Thank you for rating this movie!

King Arthur Movie Poster

4.29 / 5

User rating: 4.29

Based on 11927 votes and 146 reviews


  • User rating: 4.29 77.36%
  • User rating: 4.29 3.27%
  • User rating: 4.29 4.54%
  • User rating: 4.29 1.01%
  • User rating: 4.29 13.81%



Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars






Type the code:


 

Showing 101 to 146 of 146

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2004

the movie wasn`t so bad, but it wasn`t great, and it can NEVER be compared to lord of the rings, NEVER! Lancelot and Arthur were sooooooooooooooooooooooo HOTTTTTTTTT!!!!!! i just wish that they would have called me for the part of Guenevere because i`m prettier!!!! and she didn`t even talk! and Merlin should have been there more, as well as the love triangle! and i`m glad they didn`t put sex scenes, it would have ruined the film so bad, like Troy! next time someone is making a movie on historic facts, PLEASE call meand i`ll help you , PLEASE, you`ll need me!!!

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2004

Disappointing script, bad acting and directing. Focus is on Arthur who lacks charisma and is so naive I wonder why anybody would follow him. Some great horse and battle scenes however. Lancelot is the best character. Surprisingly Merlin has no role in the movie.

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2004

sexy sexy movie... two thumbs up!!

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2004

Lancelot was sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! great fight scenes. Kera was a little annoying.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

A great twist on this legend! Ioan Gruffudd is one to watch for in the future!

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

omg it was AWSOME lancelot was hot n so was galahad:D

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

It ranks with the worst movies I have ever seen. It seems as though the people in the legend of King Arthur got together and decided to make a movie, it in no way resembles the story or legend of King Arthur, which doesn`t really need improving on with "woad" woad is the plant from which the blue dye is derived. Oh forget it the whole thing was stupid, badly cut, and I am sure Clive Owen is not very happy with the director and editors.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

It was the most Intense, profound, powerful screen play action figure I have seen in a long time. It was just amazing It lifted me off my fee. thank you

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

It is a good action movie but, Keira kind of suck in the movie.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

i think the movie was a bit slow at the beginning then really as at the end, but arthur and lancelot were HOT!!!!!!!!

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

Lancelot was Hot! King Arthur and Galahad were pretty hot too

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

i think that it is the best version of king auther!

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

Those looking for Arthurian legend continuation or exploration of historic facts, will be disappointed. If you need it to be about King Arthur and Knights of the Round Table, go watch "Excalibur". This movie portrays the brutal reality of Britain under Roman occupation and their subsequent withdrawal leaving the land open to Saxon invasion. Arthur is a Roman soldier born of the local folk who now has to decide: follow the Romans across the Channel or stay and govern the local folk as they beg him to become their king and help them fight the new enemy, the Saxons. Five stars for the movie. This is a pretty convincing portrayal of life i

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

it was not as good as i thought it would be but it was still good

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

Excellent movie, with a plot as well as, action. Beautifully filmed. Not a kiddie film.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2004

worthless.. I wish I got refunded.. this movie is just crap

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

This movie was the best movie`s i have seen this summer. I even think it was better then the movie The Lord Of The Rings. Everyone should go see this movie it is AMAZING!!!!!!

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

The Studio just ruined what could`ve been a REAL Dark Age movie. The big heads in the Studio decided they can make more money by making it PG instead of R. It was most likely a disgrace to the War-movie lovers. So, basically I`m disapointed of the nice, and cat fights what should`ve been blood-sheding fights!

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

Boo. Boo to this movie. It was just a poor pale version of Braveheart. I was just waiting for him to scream out "Freedom!" at the end. Sheesh.

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

I think Jerry Bruckheimer did and excellent job on this movie. This movie was way different than any other Arthur/Merlin story. It was very creative, well done and great acting in it as well. I suggest people go see it.

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

Excellent - a mature film for mature audiences. If you prefer to think a bit and fill in the blanks [something so rare these days], this movie is right up your ailey. Movie was excellent from start to finish - worth seeing in the theathers. 4 stars.

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2004

I saw the movie with my two daughters. We liked it so much that we decided to stay and watch it a second time. We thought that the movie was well done, the story was great as it appealed to our sense of higher values, the battle scenes were some of the best we have seen on the screen and the knights fulfilled our expectations of what a knight should be, a hero and yet human as well. The acting was superb, we really liked the actor who played King Arthur. Congratulations to the producer, director and the cast!

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

SAVE YOUR MONEY, THIS MOVIE BLOWS!!!!!!!!!

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

It was awesome if you liked troy you will love this if you like history this is the movie to see.I am 11 year old girl and it is my favorite movie!!!

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

it very good.

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

it suck

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

it was a good all round movie however i believe many things could have been done to make it from a good movie to an oscar movie. The battle scenes were at times weak needed more ummph and the plot especially surrounding the love triangle needed to be explained and expanded more. Don`t get me wrong this is a good movie and the acting in it was very well done. Keira Knightely shined once again and clive owen was perfect for Arthur a must see movie.

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

Amazing movie. I dont know what the rest of you are saying. BUt the movie was great. As for the Saxons having an American accent. Hey, they dont speak English in the first place. So it does not really matter what accent they have. Great Movie if you like the genre.

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

It was a very cool movie,but they should have done more on the love triangle. also i think that too many people are complaining because the film wasnt rated R, its not fair that people under the age of 18 be cut out from watching this film.

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2004

Could have been better done, it was weak and cheesy.

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

it was great!!!! keira was sooo hot in her skimpy leather suit! and she hisses! but the movie was really good too. ill see it again. ill probably buy it.

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

It was so gud! The knights looked so heroic!!Their clothes made them looked so sexy!!! OMG!! The fighting scenes are so gud!! The part where all the knights are on the ice with the girl and they are all aiming at the Saxons. So heroic! This movie is a romantic, heroic, wonderful, wicked, must watch, gotta have, best movies ever!!

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

I thought it was a well done movie, and will definately be looking for it in dvd format. It certainly wasn`t a let down for me, like Spiderman 2 was.

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

Lancelot is FINE!!!!! and King Arthur is not bad either

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

This movie was a confusing twist between Braveheart and Gladiator. It was by far the worst movie I`ve ever seen, and it was an insult to the original legend. I was unaware that the Saxon invaders were had American accents and looked as though they belonged in a John Wayne movie. Perhaps a little bit of historical accuracy would have improved the story line.

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

good battle scene but at least they would have worked on the story line espically the love triangle

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2004

It was alright but some moments of sappyness ie. chest thumping ,makes one laugh..

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

I think King Arthur was a great movie... and i cant wait for it to come ot on DVD

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

I think King Arthur was a great movie. It could match up to Lord of the rings. I think it would have made the movie more exciting if Arther and Lancelot should fight over Guinevere. Over all its awesome and I would go see it one more time.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

If this is what the history is, then they made a remarkable movie. If this is a story made into a movie then it is the worst movie.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

The major problem with King Arthur is the sloppy editing. The fight scenes, I`m sure, were filmed properly yet the finished product looks liek a hybrid of Disney and TBS. I`d also say Guinevere and Lancelot both had poor character development, and Guinevere`s fight scenes were a real joke. The acting, score, story, and look of the film are great, but a war movie minus the war isn`t much of a movie. I can only hope for an R rated Director`s Cut on DVD.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

I thought it was pretty good. the battle scenes were really well done, but i think they could have made a more interesting storyline and made the love triangle between lancelot, guenevere and king arthur more pronounced. i also think we should have found ou tmore about guenevere, but all in all it was a good movie.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

This is an outstanding movie. On all levels-visual,script, music and story line- this is a work of love with art.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2004

This movie is just another reason as to why Jerry Bruckheimer`s script doctors need to be muzzled. They completely removed the Arthurian dilemma; laws and nobility versus love. Insanely accurate time-piece with the exception of the constant references to Americanized visions of freedom.

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2004

Finally a more realistic Arthur than Excalibur for the time period. Battle scenes are good.

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2004

I am not a satisfied customer. The major problem I have with the film is the HORRIBLE re-editing of the film, from R to PG. The film was made brilliantly by Antione Fuqa as a brutal Dark Ages war movie, what we have now is a nutered fell-good summer film. This REALLY pisses me off. What`s happened is the studio big-wigs decided they could make more money by editing it down to a PG level. I mean, it`s following up Spiderman 2, so of course they`ve gotta grab the kids. What this does is ruin EVERY combat/death scene in the film. We see a sword, we see someone fall, there`s nothing in between. Usually, you don`t see who`s dying till the sc

  Change Location