Based on 274 votes and 60 reviews
"Don't blame Conan." - David Letterman
Conan's hot, the action was ok but overall the story was cheesy.
Impressively mounted and grandly entertaining!
Easily the best version of the tale! 5/5
Did not have any hopes for this movie, growing up with original. It ended up being great suprise, Ron pearlman great as always.
Loved this show.. Gory, crude and downright barbaric! Anyone who rated this one star was obviously expecting some 'Disney' type Conan the Barbarian movie for little kids. This show is badass. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVED it.
It was ok. A good entertaining time killer. Remember it's Conan, so it's not expected to be spectacular.
My granson loved it,me not at all.
seen better that that
Could have been way better. How Jason Momoa could have been so great in "Game of Thrones" and so poorly cast in this film is beyond me...
Conan was very good looking and that is about it.
Poor choice to re-do.
Fun movie. It was what it set out to be.
great movie, nothing is ever going to be like the original but great effects entertaining!
This movie provided little entertainment. The original had little from a storyline and the second iteration had little to kepe me interested.
A great adaptation. Arnold?
Muscle and monotonous monologues
Could have been gorier.
If you go for action and sword fighting, you will like this. Jason Momoa makes a good warrior:)
I thought it was very well done, but no remake will beat out the original !
from someone who loved the old arnold conan, this was actually pretty good. the story starts differently but now a days makes more sense then the original version.
Almost unfair to compare it to the original. This lacked the cornball acting that made us love Arnold. Action scenes were nicely done though but every other aspect seemed just a tad unpolished.
Decent, some good action.
I like the old Conan the barbarian more, this movie wasn't as entertaining as the first...
It was a million times better than the original,non of the annoying "arnie grunts" during fight scenes. The story line was good, it kept me interested. It would've been better if there was less limbs flying off, thats just me though.
I watched this movie at Scarborough Town Centre in AVX. I liked it. I want to know if they're going to do the sequel and remake Conan the Destroyer? Also I would like to see them turn Conan the Adventurer into a movie also.
The best film of the series. 3/5
A far cry from what Conan should have been, poor story and forced action sequences leads to a banal movie.
The big, splashy production numbers lend much-needed class to this overly familiar story.
Excellent job loved it!
terrible should have walked out ... but didn't kept waiting for it to get better, it never did
Suneagle's Review 2*'s. WOW what the hell happened? I'll tell you what happened no passing the tourch to Mamoa no Arnold no Mileus! THE NEXT TIME STUDIOS WANT TO RE BOOT A FRANCHISE STOP FOR A SEC AND REALIZE ACTORS ARE BOUND TO IT AS WELL AS FANS!!! JUST AS CLASH OF THE TITANS WAS A CRAPPY RE-MAKE (No Majestical OWL, SWORD, HELMET, & SHIELD etc & Characters were all over the place, SO WAS THIS! WHATS NEXT MAD MAX WITH NO MELL GIBSON? RAMBO WITH NO STALLONE? DIE HARD WITH NO BRUCE WILLIS? BEAST MASTER WITH NO MARC SINGER?SHOULD OF PASSED THE TOURCH AND SHOULD OF USED SOMEONE BIGGER LIKE THE ROCK! Now that i got that off my chest. Fighting was not bad the kid they used for young Conan was AMA
I took my two kids to this movie and found it both vulgar and violent. I think next time I'll ust take them to the Hangover
watched it in 2d would have been better in 3d.
What do you expect? It was great for what it was. And a horse gets punched!
Barbaric, as it should be. However, the camera work was unspectacular, the digital scenery when used was interesting but looked so different from the rest of the non-digital settings that it spoiled the look. Relatively unfamiliar actors, except for S Lang. Tiring to watch even though some scenes okay. 3D didn't add too much to the movie. Not worth the watch in a theater overall.
This movie was better than what was expected. The acting wasn't bad (better than Arnold) the story line was okay. I honestly think that the original was over rated and doesn't deserve that much credit. Seriously if it wasn't Arnold it would be bashed worse than who ever is bashing this movie remake.
Barely watchable, the original was much better.
just what I wanted, I enjoyed Jason Momoa's preformance.
This movie was racist and disgusting. I think anyone who actually enjoyed tis movie has some serious ental problems. same your time and money, dont see it.
Jason Momoa continues to show how much talent he's got to offer. All in all, there were good fight scenes, great costuming and an awesome cast to match the interesting script.
Poor acting and a weak story line. People popped like balloons in this movie when hit and the blood insanely over the top.
Brainy remake of the brawny original is sure to please fans!
This was a very fun movie. The action was very well done. great movement and physicality all around. It had some funny moments too, although small. Too many people expect citizen kane. This was conan we are talking about.
Even in 3-D this is one of the worst movies we have ever seen. The story has been done a million times, it is brutal and really disgusting overall. The acting is horrible it seems the only lines you need to learn to act in this file are grunts. Anyways overall a waste of money.
It was good, just why it is only in 3d