Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle - User Reviews

Thank you for rating this movie!

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle Movie Poster

3.38 / 5

User rating: 3.38

Based on 3104 votes and 139 reviews


  • User rating: 3.38 50.57%
  • User rating: 3.38 7.73%
  • User rating: 3.38 4.91%
  • User rating: 3.38 3.14%
  • User rating: 3.38 33.66%



Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars






Type the code:


 

Showing 51 to 100 of 139

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2003

I tought that the sequal would be worse but as it turns out it was amazing. I think that in the previews they shouldn`t show that the old angel is the bad guy...b causez it gave the movie away...... but none the les it was great!

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2003

I thought it was crap.They try to do the same fighting style as in the matrix.And personally i thought the matrix was also crap.I dont think people like to see cheesy moves 50 feet up in the air.Its totally not real and a big dissapointing.

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2003

I thought it was too un-realalistic. Otherwise it was full of action. A lot of fighting and violence. Great movie. If you like this kind of stuff see it in the theater if you don`t i suggest you rent it when it comes out.

User review rating: 0 July 13, 2003

This movie was horrible. I expected something better.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2003

very fun but a few of those stunts were a little unrealistic

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2003

The first one was better, this version took itself too lightly, there was no plot, just 3 ladies running around doing stupid things in very little clothes. Somehow the first one did this too but managed to be funny, this one is just too dumb.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2003

You could barely hear the dialogue...the stunts over the top but what do u expect the first one was the same.

User review rating: 0 July 12, 2003

Great movie!!! Funny and just AWSOME!!! I love Charlie`s Angels!

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2003

Warning crap ahead! What a waste of time! I hope "McG" (director) goes back to whatever he was doing before this debacle. The plot is muddled, the action was Matrix style wire work, Brenie Mac was useless and the sexual innuendos seemed to be more about McG`s bondage fantasies than the light-hearted nudge and wink of the first movie. It`s been a looong time since I`ve seen such a piece of garbage! (And I see almost everything that comes out). Avoid this movie!!!!!

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2003

I was extremely disappointed in this movie. The first Charlie`s Angels was so good that I fully expected that this one would be as well. Oh well, that so often happens - hardly worth making the second.

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2003

The worst movie I have ever seen.

User review rating: 0 July 11, 2003

I thought the movie was great! A great summer movie...Of course the stunts were over the top, but what do we expect from this type of movie. Pure entertainment and escapism.

User review rating: 0 July 10, 2003

AARRGHHH... such potential, such waste. I guess "the Devil made them do it??"

User review rating: 0 July 09, 2003

I expected the sequel to be as good as the first one, even better considering Demi Moore`s comeback in this movie. Althought the action sequences were awesome, one might even ask one`s self if they`re there to camouflage the uninspired dialogue.The dialogue in this movie could have been compilated by a ditsy airhead; in other words, it didn`t impress me.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2003

Way too much booty! Very cheap and cheesy.

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2003

why don`t they just try acting? Drew Barrymore comes from a family of actors that stretches back 150 years, but it appears now that her choice of roles will be restricted to those involving poorly-contrived stunts, camera-triks, computer-graphics manipulation, and implied bi-sexuality. who are the other two again?

User review rating: 0 July 08, 2003

I think it was disappointing. The only think good was seeing Demi Moore in a bikini. At her age, she looked hot. There was a few cameos from famous stars too. Don`t pay full price to see it. The first one was much better. I hate it when sequels aren`t better that their predecessors!!!!! Wake up Hollywood.

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2003

It was terrible ... cheesy! I feel ashamed to be a female!

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2003

Its eye candy-a visual feast! It`s also COMPLETELY over the top. But suspend reality for a couple of hours and go enjoy. It`s great summer escapist fare.

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2003

disappointed...action scenes were too over the top...some funny parts though

User review rating: 0 July 07, 2003

I thought is was entertaining, I found Bernie Mac very funny as Bosley. I enjoyed the action. It was good to look at. I give it 7 out of 10!

User review rating: 0 July 06, 2003

this movie is cOoL ^_^

User review rating: 0 July 06, 2003

Exactly what I was expecting. This movie is fun, completely silly, and full of campy knock-offs. It`s hilarious. I was disappointed with Demi Moore though, I don`t know what the heck everyone is making such a big deal about. Seamus O`Grady[Justin Theroux] stole the show. OUCH!

User review rating: 0 July 06, 2003

Well, I had mixed feelings. The action scenes were out of this world, but the plot you couldn` t fiqure out too much of what it was all about and what Charlie`s Angels were supposed to do...I didn`t Enjoy it as much as the 1st one, but I did like it!

User review rating: 0 July 05, 2003

I think the movie was great but I like the 1st 1 better. 4 stars

User review rating: 0 July 05, 2003

It`s just terrible....

User review rating: 0 July 05, 2003

I thought that the action was too far fetched. I like action films but most of the big scenes were impossible. If they toned dowm on some of that stuff it would be a five out of five.

User review rating: 0 July 05, 2003

Yeck!

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

id rather clean the grit between my toes

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

I was very surprised and disapointed at how much of a T&A flick it is, also they make it very unrealistic, very disapointing, if they wore clothes and made the scenes more believable it would be a way better movie

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

it was good. not as good as the 1st one but its satisfying.

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

It was an awesome movie everyone who thinks it sucked is just jealous!!

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

im going to see it again.its so good.

User review rating: 0 July 04, 2003

TIS MOVIE MAKES NO SENSE.SAVE YOUR MONEY STUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPIIIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

I was exceedingly disappointed when I saw this movie. Honestly they throw things at you that make no sense. People just come out of no where, without any real introduction! And what was with the thin man and Drew making out in the middle of a battle? Seriously! I don`t get it! Someone want to explain? The only good part was Seamus O`Grady (Justin Theroux)

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

This movie screams FAKE from begining to end

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

how much T&A can you take -- now I know why it is called ` full throttle` I would like to throttle the smoe that thought it would be great to have a bunch of women running around in bikini`s complaining they don`t get taken seriously-- puh lees spare me and Demi Moore that money on plastic surgery was worth it but did we need to see you plotting murder and double crossess in your underwear? The first one was far superior to this drivel. Should have been Charlie`s Angels Pole Dancers

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

What a good movie all you who say it wasnt good...well lets just say your wrong! i DEFENATLY say that girls rule and we kick butt!

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

Charlie`s Angels, OVER EXAGERATED! It`s IMPOSSIBLE the STUNTS that they do, unless they were JACKIE CHAN! The first one was WAY BETTER! Don`t waste your money watching this movie!

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

I thought that this movie was exciting and funny, except the fighting scenes were a little lame, so they could have made them look more realistic

User review rating: 0 July 03, 2003

Pure Candy, very funny and the action was thrilling and the girls were sexy. The negative comments it has received are from people who were expecting to see some sort of female, James Bond action thriller. It`s not mean`t to be a clever investigative crime drama either. Its 3 sexy, funny girls doing a campy send-up of a 70`s tv show and it`s Hilarious. 5 Stars

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

Not recommended for viewers over the age of 13. I`m 14 and I was disappointed.

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

I think the first one was better! But still...this one had a lot of good action packed moves! You go girls! :)

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

I think that chalie`s angel is GREAT!! it has the best graphic and matrix...heheh...anyways...I think you guys are great I hope the next movie comes out soon!!

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

Lets face it, all the producers at Hollywood want is your money$$ They don`t care about making a film that will be good and entertaining. This movie is so bad, you should save your money for something better. You think with the millions of books out there, they do a better job. Oh well looks like another summer of bad movies.

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

Purely eye candy for guys. The sequel is definitely not as good as the first one. This movie is more like cartoon Strapperalla`s truewomen show. In addition, the ending was too simple and quite disappointing.

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

Apparently gravity, realism and originality are not part of the script. Oh well, good thing I saw it for cheap.

User review rating: 0 July 02, 2003

i thought it was a GREAT MOVIE!! hope they make a 3rd movie!! if they do make a 3rd movie..hope the thin man is alive still!! cuz he`s cool.lol. cant wait to buy the movie when it comes out!! :-)

User review rating: 0 July 01, 2003

Hey! to: Drew, Lucy, Cameron, and Shia! This was an AWESOME movie! I loved it not only because there was a lot of action, but because Shia was in it!!! Oh god!!! Haha! Is there going to be a 3rd Charlies Angels? I reccommend it with Shia!

User review rating: 0 July 01, 2003

too many cameos all the money went into paying for the acters and actresses and little went into everything else like script writing. And whoever made this film, don`t think that your audience is just going to be hillbillies.

  Change Location